Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-09 06:27:06 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 26468AA564D6AE6E6C12C76B2CCE94339D60EC6D843BE22407F809304426E325
Participant Details

Original Note:

Attention aux notes qui comporte des commentaires personnels. De nombreux juristes et avocats estiment que prouver l’absence de consentement posera de sérieuses difficultés aux victimes. Le « + extensif » est un avis perso infondé qui n’a pas sa place dans une note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755296021863649785
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 26468AA564D6AE6E6C12C76B2CCE94339D60EC6D843BE22407F809304426E325
  • createdAtMillis - 1707460026856
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175529602186364978526468AA564D6AE6E6C12C76B2CCE94339D60EC6D843BE22407F809304426E325