Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-08 04:32:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C67E1E338B59294DCE46285C2DEF08870AF2FD32EA89A4DC25DEDA24903A854A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Outre le fait que les techniques d'édition génétique sont maîtrisées et ne représentent pas de risque pour la santé des consommateurs, de nombreux scientifiques ont soutenu la mise en place d'une législation moins stricte, citant entre autres des avantages écologiques. https://www.lepoint.fr/environnement/ogm-34-prix-nobel-implorent-l-europe-d-assouplir-sa-legislation-au-nom-du-climat-19-01-2024-2550152_1927.php

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1755262031379227100
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C67E1E338B59294DCE46285C2DEF08870AF2FD32EA89A4DC25DEDA24903A854A
createdAtMillis - 1707366746698
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1755262031379227100C67E1E338B59294DCE46285C2DEF08870AF2FD32EA89A4DC25DEDA24903A854A