Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-07 19:16:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A244CB096DF2F565549A1996ED21511F492CED99E53491EC455C6E4258CC12E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Outre le fait que les techniques d'édition génétique sont maîtrisées et ne représentent pas de risque pour la santé des consommateurs, de nombreux scientifiques ont soutenu la mise en place d'une législation moins stricte, citant entre autres des avantages écologiques. https://www.lepoint.fr/environnement/ogm-34-prix-nobel-implorent-l-europe-d-assouplir-sa-legislation-au-nom-du-climat-19-01-2024-2550152_1927.php

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1755262031379227100
participantId -
raterParticipantId - A244CB096DF2F565549A1996ED21511F492CED99E53491EC455C6E4258CC12E4
createdAtMillis - 1707333365258
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1755262031379227100A244CB096DF2F565549A1996ED21511F492CED99E53491EC455C6E4258CC12E4