Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-07 22:11:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 89BDCF5C2C3DD226BA8AEAB26E559173A84B470562622A9FCEF82A633AFF5D12
Participant Details

Original Note:

Outre le fait que les techniques d'édition génétique sont maîtrisées et ne représentent pas de risque pour la santé des consommateurs, de nombreux scientifiques ont soutenu la mise en place d'une législation moins stricte, citant entre autres des avantages écologiques. https://www.lepoint.fr/environnement/ogm-34-prix-nobel-implorent-l-europe-d-assouplir-sa-legislation-au-nom-du-climat-19-01-2024-2550152_1927.php

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1755262031379227100
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 89BDCF5C2C3DD226BA8AEAB26E559173A84B470562622A9FCEF82A633AFF5D12
createdAtMillis - 1707343887932
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 175526203137922710089BDCF5C2C3DD226BA8AEAB26E559173A84B470562622A9FCEF82A633AFF5D12