Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-08 17:35:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 68BE80F61BDE7C5039044C5692FF6DD40569B7B2B64BA490266AE8BDCFCAB16D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Outre le fait que les techniques d'édition génétique sont maîtrisées et ne représentent pas de risque pour la santé des consommateurs, de nombreux scientifiques ont soutenu la mise en place d'une législation moins stricte, citant entre autres des avantages écologiques. https://www.lepoint.fr/environnement/ogm-34-prix-nobel-implorent-l-europe-d-assouplir-sa-legislation-au-nom-du-climat-19-01-2024-2550152_1927.php

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1755262031379227100
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 68BE80F61BDE7C5039044C5692FF6DD40569B7B2B64BA490266AE8BDCFCAB16D
createdAtMillis - 1707413751594
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 175526203137922710068BE80F61BDE7C5039044C5692FF6DD40569B7B2B64BA490266AE8BDCFCAB16D