Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-07 22:26:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2064F8BD9107A63D9EC2F3E66D482DAE4301C754CD8245418ECA46B32502F69B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Outre le fait que les techniques d'édition génétique sont maîtrisées et ne représentent pas de risque pour la santé des consommateurs, de nombreux scientifiques ont soutenu la mise en place d'une législation moins stricte, citant entre autres des avantages écologiques. https://www.lepoint.fr/environnement/ogm-34-prix-nobel-implorent-l-europe-d-assouplir-sa-legislation-au-nom-du-climat-19-01-2024-2550152_1927.php

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1755262031379227100
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 2064F8BD9107A63D9EC2F3E66D482DAE4301C754CD8245418ECA46B32502F69B
createdAtMillis - 1707344792975
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17552620313792271002064F8BD9107A63D9EC2F3E66D482DAE4301C754CD8245418ECA46B32502F69B