Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-07 08:43:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 04E658F327477F298500303FD85F3678B4103AB9199117C4DE8636A178EC3945
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The attempts made by Community noters here to abuse the system to push their own narratives and biases is appalling. Disagree with Tucker or not on his opinions, leave it in the replies. That’s what it is for. Noters should reread the CN guide https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/about/introduction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755145968797077718
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 04E658F327477F298500303FD85F3678B4103AB9199117C4DE8636A178EC3945
  • createdAtMillis - 1707295416300
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175514596879707771804E658F327477F298500303FD85F3678B4103AB9199117C4DE8636A178EC3945