Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-07 15:17:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3D5FACD8C60B106F5D44F1E65E4DE205E33E9EF7FBD847D4F909F040496F71D6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note is probably correct but the source is literally just a tweet without proof, if you want to add a note abt skeptics don't present them as fact either

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755042601466478869
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3D5FACD8C60B106F5D44F1E65E4DE205E33E9EF7FBD847D4F909F040496F71D6
  • createdAtMillis - 1707319033327
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17550426014664788693D5FACD8C60B106F5D44F1E65E4DE205E33E9EF7FBD847D4F909F040496F71D6