Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-07 17:43:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 852ADD5E3E52AC33ED06B31B25C34C83135912880A059091D77E30D0FD359264
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN el tweet señala un hecho objetivamente cierto. La nota propuesta sólo señala que la base de la demanda se centra en la privacidad, cosa que no es incompatible con que el potencial demandado hace el seguimiento para publicar su huella ambiental.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755011774175142158
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 852ADD5E3E52AC33ED06B31B25C34C83135912880A059091D77E30D0FD359264
  • createdAtMillis - 1707327803392
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1755011774175142158852ADD5E3E52AC33ED06B31B25C34C83135912880A059091D77E30D0FD359264