Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-07 00:10:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2C4EE67AB7DB37A3E5323F83CEB3C1254F55A355474F42788B0DAE12CD518CFC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN el tweet señala un hecho objetivamente cierto. La nota propuesta sólo señala que la base de la demanda se centra en la privacidad, cosa que no es incompatible con que el potencial demandado hace el seguimiento para publicar su huella ambiental.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755011774175142158
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2C4EE67AB7DB37A3E5323F83CEB3C1254F55A355474F42788B0DAE12CD518CFC
  • createdAtMillis - 1707264642737
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17550117741751421582C4EE67AB7DB37A3E5323F83CEB3C1254F55A355474F42788B0DAE12CD518CFC