Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-07 14:36:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F1E58661EFB9C04905F456911CAD6AF68E68768CA1279DCA98CE0AD7129E3A30
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is absolutely no proof this guy is cheating, and I have no idea why so many people found the CN to be accurate. The approved note is PURELY speculation, and should not be taken as fact.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755011631732392412
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F1E58661EFB9C04905F456911CAD6AF68E68768CA1279DCA98CE0AD7129E3A30
  • createdAtMillis - 1707316596339
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1755011631732392412F1E58661EFB9C04905F456911CAD6AF68E68768CA1279DCA98CE0AD7129E3A30