Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-07 07:07:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFA72644133FF0F0089325E0C43AC8D576CD1B779BC3420345FE2098635F58E2
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is absolutely no proof this guy is cheating, and I have no idea why so many people found the CN to be accurate. The approved note is PURELY speculation, and should not be taken as fact.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755011631732392412
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFA72644133FF0F0089325E0C43AC8D576CD1B779BC3420345FE2098635F58E2
  • createdAtMillis - 1707289649687
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1755011631732392412EFA72644133FF0F0089325E0C43AC8D576CD1B779BC3420345FE2098635F58E2