Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-07 00:34:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6A0322578D093F6C45FE62CB4EA58518C996225F10FFBB10571B0364B5E90A84
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is absolutely no proof this guy is cheating, and I have no idea why so many people found the CN to be accurate. The approved note is PURELY speculation, and should not be taken as fact.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755011631732392412
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6A0322578D093F6C45FE62CB4EA58518C996225F10FFBB10571B0364B5E90A84
  • createdAtMillis - 1707266045117
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17550116317323924126A0322578D093F6C45FE62CB4EA58518C996225F10FFBB10571B0364B5E90A84