Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-07 12:34:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 60D04ED85F08558612A3325A882119AAA8B54A481A43344A0815C1DEEADB73F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is absolutely no proof this guy is cheating, and I have no idea why so many people found the CN to be accurate. The approved note is PURELY speculation, and should not be taken as fact.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755011631732392412
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 60D04ED85F08558612A3325A882119AAA8B54A481A43344A0815C1DEEADB73F4
  • createdAtMillis - 1707309241911
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175501163173239241260D04ED85F08558612A3325A882119AAA8B54A481A43344A0815C1DEEADB73F4