Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-06 23:34:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 992DE44DB027B156346FB217E28927F43E4614CBA3B89D3C7E083396DEB9DE90
Participant Details

Original Note:

1. Most notes here do not articulate anything misleading or demanding of additional context - hence those NNN 2. Some notes assert no basis for Tucker to believe his content might be banned. (i) it is his opinion (ii) the prior bans on RT and other interference suggest otherwise

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754986231069393399
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 992DE44DB027B156346FB217E28927F43E4614CBA3B89D3C7E083396DEB9DE90
  • createdAtMillis - 1707262453422
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1754986231069393399992DE44DB027B156346FB217E28927F43E4614CBA3B89D3C7E083396DEB9DE90