Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-06 23:54:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 468E47CB5F897AF53FB931FFC1B31FADB300B937DBECD2B919296714F90D0E30
Participant Details

Original Note:

1. Most notes here do not articulate anything misleading or demanding of additional context - hence those NNN 2. Some notes assert no basis for Tucker to believe his content might be banned. (i) it is his opinion (ii) the prior bans on RT and other interference suggest otherwise

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754986231069393399
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 468E47CB5F897AF53FB931FFC1B31FADB300B937DBECD2B919296714F90D0E30
  • createdAtMillis - 1707263683823
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1754986231069393399468E47CB5F897AF53FB931FFC1B31FADB300B937DBECD2B919296714F90D0E30