Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-06 21:56:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 35B8A9EE7E563FB800547FE0798ACFAEB834A6F80C205F2DCA4F91057777A5C9
Participant Details

Original Note:

1. Most notes here do not articulate anything misleading or demanding of additional context - hence those NNN 2. Some notes assert no basis for Tucker to believe his content might be banned. (i) it is his opinion (ii) the prior bans on RT and other interference suggest otherwise

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754986231069393399
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 35B8A9EE7E563FB800547FE0798ACFAEB834A6F80C205F2DCA4F91057777A5C9
  • createdAtMillis - 1707256566079
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175498623106939339935B8A9EE7E563FB800547FE0798ACFAEB834A6F80C205F2DCA4F91057777A5C9