Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-04 10:07:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 27E99C5EA9EA9484116F421D8B6E9151E1688E5F9E93C0215714E33C1D3E38EA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Es ist unzutreffend, dass die von Clauser kritisierten Modelle eine Schlüsselvariable (hier: Wolken) ignorieren. In den IPCC-Berichten ist diese enthalten. https://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2023/11/clauser-ology-cloudy-with-a-chance-of-meatballs/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754974162928505132
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 27E99C5EA9EA9484116F421D8B6E9151E1688E5F9E93C0215714E33C1D3E38EA
  • createdAtMillis - 1709546851700
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 175497416292850513227E99C5EA9EA9484116F421D8B6E9151E1688E5F9E93C0215714E33C1D3E38EA