Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-06 20:51:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EDDBC88A011C88EAE0DB97C9D13F7D846AD694EB119E2C9A60442DE0E99B4591
Participant Details

Original Note:

The case of U.S. vs Donald J Trump was heard by three not four judges (Henderson, Childs and Pan). https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/1AC5A0E7090A350785258ABB0052D942/$file/23-3228-2039001.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754956745888465030
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EDDBC88A011C88EAE0DB97C9D13F7D846AD694EB119E2C9A60442DE0E99B4591
  • createdAtMillis - 1707252705385
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1754956745888465030EDDBC88A011C88EAE0DB97C9D13F7D846AD694EB119E2C9A60442DE0E99B4591