Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-06 20:24:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8116F2AB46F9CE216DCC7B5031035B9C29F97155AD48151E3939EDBD00AEA635
Participant Details

Original Note:

The case of U.S. vs Donald J Trump was heard by three not four judges (Henderson, Childs and Pan). https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/1AC5A0E7090A350785258ABB0052D942/$file/23-3228-2039001.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754956745888465030
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8116F2AB46F9CE216DCC7B5031035B9C29F97155AD48151E3939EDBD00AEA635
  • createdAtMillis - 1707251045765
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17549567458884650308116F2AB46F9CE216DCC7B5031035B9C29F97155AD48151E3939EDBD00AEA635