Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-06 05:17:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BDF8EFA36CB0B96A21B55B812900678A5E1A42F665EF20EC1DF799208F76464D
Participant Details

Original Note:

週刊誌報道や所属事務所の見解がすべて金科玉条であるという思考もミスリードを招く素因なのでより慎重な判断材料が求められます。 http://www2.econ.tohoku.ac.jp/~takaura/19tajima.pdf https://www.lawschool.tsukuba.ac.jp/admin/18zennbunn.pdf https://www.chunichi.co.jp/article/842430

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754637558922060043
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BDF8EFA36CB0B96A21B55B812900678A5E1A42F665EF20EC1DF799208F76464D
  • createdAtMillis - 1707196642741
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1754637558922060043BDF8EFA36CB0B96A21B55B812900678A5E1A42F665EF20EC1DF799208F76464D