Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-06 08:34:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B841C52CB7BAE388B5C4A67B9CBC9B0A0AD6DC384127DB5F7EB98B34224B51B
Participant Details

Original Note:

週刊誌報道や所属事務所の見解がすべて金科玉条であるという思考もミスリードを招く素因なのでより慎重な判断材料が求められます。 http://www2.econ.tohoku.ac.jp/~takaura/19tajima.pdf https://www.lawschool.tsukuba.ac.jp/admin/18zennbunn.pdf https://www.chunichi.co.jp/article/842430

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754637558922060043
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1B841C52CB7BAE388B5C4A67B9CBC9B0A0AD6DC384127DB5F7EB98B34224B51B
  • createdAtMillis - 1707208491568
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17546375589220600431B841C52CB7BAE388B5C4A67B9CBC9B0A0AD6DC384127DB5F7EB98B34224B51B