Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-06 03:17:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0FF5CC808DBF4379408EEED1BF4253DE09EB27CCA832D4A8DC5C4DDC67A6DE8B
Participant Details

Original Note:

週刊誌報道や所属事務所の見解がすべて金科玉条であるという思考もミスリードを招く素因なのでより慎重な判断材料が求められます。 http://www2.econ.tohoku.ac.jp/~takaura/19tajima.pdf https://www.lawschool.tsukuba.ac.jp/admin/18zennbunn.pdf https://www.chunichi.co.jp/article/842430

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754637558922060043
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0FF5CC808DBF4379408EEED1BF4253DE09EB27CCA832D4A8DC5C4DDC67A6DE8B
  • createdAtMillis - 1707189454530
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17546375589220600430FF5CC808DBF4379408EEED1BF4253DE09EB27CCA832D4A8DC5C4DDC67A6DE8B