Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-06 02:27:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 090DCA396BD2B58E13CC379B407CA5CFA626FB1CA4AAEDD48617F3EE7D11AB7D
Participant Details

Original Note:

週刊誌報道や所属事務所の見解がすべて金科玉条であるという思考もミスリードを招く素因なのでより慎重な判断材料が求められます。 http://www2.econ.tohoku.ac.jp/~takaura/19tajima.pdf https://www.lawschool.tsukuba.ac.jp/admin/18zennbunn.pdf https://www.chunichi.co.jp/article/842430

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754637558922060043
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 090DCA396BD2B58E13CC379B407CA5CFA626FB1CA4AAEDD48617F3EE7D11AB7D
  • createdAtMillis - 1707186452094
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1754637558922060043090DCA396BD2B58E13CC379B407CA5CFA626FB1CA4AAEDD48617F3EE7D11AB7D