Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-05 21:10:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1A00510EAF7AE32853C17BEFDCB849B64F8AFA63F37AF8817390449FD49D1F7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Vance used an Article 2 example to avoid addressing the claim by Stephanopolous regarding whether President could disregard Supreme Court Ruling. The same approach was tried by Nixon trying to justify his illegal actions as falling under his Article 2 powers.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754607371739943359
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C1A00510EAF7AE32853C17BEFDCB849B64F8AFA63F37AF8817390449FD49D1F7
  • createdAtMillis - 1707167431656
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1754607371739943359C1A00510EAF7AE32853C17BEFDCB849B64F8AFA63F37AF8817390449FD49D1F7