Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-06 03:55:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7E68EF40AFD861244DF851C4B7E1B1542D7EE40CD3101B1E0D5EF4E99D03EB82
Participant Details

Original Note:

Vance used an Article 2 example to avoid addressing the claim by Stephanopolous regarding whether President could disregard Supreme Court Ruling. The same approach was tried by Nixon trying to justify his illegal actions as falling under his Article 2 powers.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754607371739943359
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7E68EF40AFD861244DF851C4B7E1B1542D7EE40CD3101B1E0D5EF4E99D03EB82
  • createdAtMillis - 1707191726302
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17546073717399433597E68EF40AFD861244DF851C4B7E1B1542D7EE40CD3101B1E0D5EF4E99D03EB82