Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-05 21:02:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 263E8DFF514B5CEC0D3DF9E9CF7FB6F3BDF5FA2104D2914512306CD126D83D48
Participant Details

Original Note:

Vance used an Article 2 example to avoid addressing the claim by Stephanopolous regarding whether President could disregard Supreme Court Ruling. The same approach was tried by Nixon trying to justify his illegal actions as falling under his Article 2 powers.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754607371739943359
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 263E8DFF514B5CEC0D3DF9E9CF7FB6F3BDF5FA2104D2914512306CD126D83D48
  • createdAtMillis - 1707166940474
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1754607371739943359263E8DFF514B5CEC0D3DF9E9CF7FB6F3BDF5FA2104D2914512306CD126D83D48