Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-05 21:22:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2608AADB64E8A92A9B51B74505C4032C27132737323D675DAAB36B2C17BBF662
Participant Details

Original Note:

Vance used an Article 2 example to avoid addressing the claim by Stephanopolous regarding whether President could disregard Supreme Court Ruling. The same approach was tried by Nixon trying to justify his illegal actions as falling under his Article 2 powers.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754607371739943359
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2608AADB64E8A92A9B51B74505C4032C27132737323D675DAAB36B2C17BBF662
  • createdAtMillis - 1707168156402
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17546073717399433592608AADB64E8A92A9B51B74505C4032C27132737323D675DAAB36B2C17BBF662