Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-06 03:17:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 215DA38073740D71DB1DF414086A8684A013338E2A623F1ABA32714BE7C55A53
Participant Details

Original Note:

Vance used an Article 2 example to avoid addressing the claim by Stephanopolous regarding whether President could disregard Supreme Court Ruling. The same approach was tried by Nixon trying to justify his illegal actions as falling under his Article 2 powers.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754607371739943359
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 215DA38073740D71DB1DF414086A8684A013338E2A623F1ABA32714BE7C55A53
  • createdAtMillis - 1707189471903
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1754607371739943359215DA38073740D71DB1DF414086A8684A013338E2A623F1ABA32714BE7C55A53