Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-05 08:01:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1117F911D879001B7FD67B55A8A4368B02B810C9496EF7E80F9B9D3329D2ACF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Dergelijke berichten zijn negatief opiniƫrend jegens mensen die je als concurrent van de traditionele media kunt beschouwen door een taalgebruik wat mensen vaak als denigrerend beschouwen. Mevrouw Blommestijn zelfstandig beoordelen? Kijk op haar media account https://twitter.com/rblommestijn

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754413038109610077
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C1117F911D879001B7FD67B55A8A4368B02B810C9496EF7E80F9B9D3329D2ACF
  • createdAtMillis - 1707120075690
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1754413038109610077C1117F911D879001B7FD67B55A8A4368B02B810C9496EF7E80F9B9D3329D2ACF