Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-05 08:11:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2C2A095A371A70BBD225CB2BBA89976E480E928EAB5E2E90445FB07D6F64533F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Dergelijke berichten zijn negatief opiniƫrend jegens mensen die je als concurrent van de traditionele media kunt beschouwen door een taalgebruik wat mensen vaak als denigrerend beschouwen. Mevrouw Blommestijn zelfstandig beoordelen? Kijk op haar media account https://twitter.com/rblommestijn

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754413038109610077
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2C2A095A371A70BBD225CB2BBA89976E480E928EAB5E2E90445FB07D6F64533F
  • createdAtMillis - 1707120667239
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17544130381096100772C2A095A371A70BBD225CB2BBA89976E480E928EAB5E2E90445FB07D6F64533F