Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-05 02:58:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 21A874E8ADC5C2A63D3507829B8B06319759BAC700B7D888C7B44316CAAA30F1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. if the previous CN had read even just the full article title they would realise the article agrees with their point. Otherwise, the article provides speculation and opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754334672019235170
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 21A874E8ADC5C2A63D3507829B8B06319759BAC700B7D888C7B44316CAAA30F1
  • createdAtMillis - 1707101886571
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175433467201923517021A874E8ADC5C2A63D3507829B8B06319759BAC700B7D888C7B44316CAAA30F1