Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-05 09:56:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BE68A695312518DAD977704DFD8A09B5067AB3CDFE22F884914DDAA7D14FA607
Participant Details

Original Note:

No credible outlets have run such a story, and the post does not cite any evidence beyond a quote from an unnamed "Legal Expert." This account has a track record of posting unverified stories which later turn out to be false. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N37Y1O5/ https://www.ibtimes.co.in/first-cnn-now-youtube-twitter-account-take-different-identities-spread-fake-news-825438

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1754300029160828977
participantId -
raterParticipantId - BE68A695312518DAD977704DFD8A09B5067AB3CDFE22F884914DDAA7D14FA607
createdAtMillis - 1707126987150
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1754300029160828977BE68A695312518DAD977704DFD8A09B5067AB3CDFE22F884914DDAA7D14FA607