Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-04 14:03:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9F2B3F30449FAD776DB42A1F7EB53FFC11B0FBFAA5A8E7FCC5E80346FD3B9697
Participant Details

Original Note:

Additional source which directly addresses the theory at: https://climatefeedback.org/claimreview/three-decades-chemtrail-haarp-geoengineering-conspiracy-theory-remains-popular-despite-lack-evidence-no-scientific-basis/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754135856971989011
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9F2B3F30449FAD776DB42A1F7EB53FFC11B0FBFAA5A8E7FCC5E80346FD3B9697
  • createdAtMillis - 1707055413034
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17541358569719890119F2B3F30449FAD776DB42A1F7EB53FFC11B0FBFAA5A8E7FCC5E80346FD3B9697