Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-05 00:42:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 80D6E5FA019B8E5525249A0659485ABEF36094C2007752792D4CD977DC311BA4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The proposed note states "The article in the original post", which should have been your cue to go post the note... in the original post.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754078135455461837
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 80D6E5FA019B8E5525249A0659485ABEF36094C2007752792D4CD977DC311BA4
  • createdAtMillis - 1707093751896
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175407813545546183780D6E5FA019B8E5525249A0659485ABEF36094C2007752792D4CD977DC311BA4