Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-04 16:22:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F7C067A07D5FA373E2E9AAA0C13D4B7AF7236DE981A6752504DECC99E563D15
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The proposed note states "The article in the original post", which should have been your cue to go post the note... in the original post.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754078135455461837
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F7C067A07D5FA373E2E9AAA0C13D4B7AF7236DE981A6752504DECC99E563D15
  • createdAtMillis - 1707063725363
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17540781354554618374F7C067A07D5FA373E2E9AAA0C13D4B7AF7236DE981A6752504DECC99E563D15