Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-04 02:28:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A9EF61BDE7E04B8D1A9148C0315E53E71DDAA616E06AC986F438FD18C040D94A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ICJ's ruling on January 26 specifies that the court was not deciding whether Israel's acts in Gaza violate the Genocide Convention, simply whether the acts South Africa accused Israel of violating would, if proven, make a plausible case for such (see p. 12 pp. 30). https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240126-ord-01-00-en.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753912170348167489
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A9EF61BDE7E04B8D1A9148C0315E53E71DDAA616E06AC986F438FD18C040D94A
  • createdAtMillis - 1707013701799
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1753912170348167489A9EF61BDE7E04B8D1A9148C0315E53E71DDAA616E06AC986F438FD18C040D94A