Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-04 21:37:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9CC7A4FB9C30D5D6BEE2B93E5B7E2A0C595FB6324971516AAB363C601F570B72
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ICJ's ruling on January 26 specifies that the court was not deciding whether Israel's acts in Gaza violate the Genocide Convention, simply whether the acts South Africa accused Israel of violating would, if proven, make a plausible case for such (see p. 12 pp. 30). https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240126-ord-01-00-en.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753912170348167489
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9CC7A4FB9C30D5D6BEE2B93E5B7E2A0C595FB6324971516AAB363C601F570B72
  • createdAtMillis - 1707082647346
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17539121703481674899CC7A4FB9C30D5D6BEE2B93E5B7E2A0C595FB6324971516AAB363C601F570B72