Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-04 14:26:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3D70E26D6F36A1D5C8834B5469EF5F184E62F9EDA79A38AD2E2D4B44F52A0FE1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ICJ's ruling on January 26 specifies that the court was not deciding whether Israel's acts in Gaza violate the Genocide Convention, simply whether the acts South Africa accused Israel of violating would, if proven, make a plausible case for such (see p. 12 pp. 30). https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240126-ord-01-00-en.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753912170348167489
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3D70E26D6F36A1D5C8834B5469EF5F184E62F9EDA79A38AD2E2D4B44F52A0FE1
  • createdAtMillis - 1707056811433
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17539121703481674893D70E26D6F36A1D5C8834B5469EF5F184E62F9EDA79A38AD2E2D4B44F52A0FE1