Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-04 11:54:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 345E5F7B3E9078CACE79ED89E154DCECB18E6184E769562B03C0C25F9124265D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ICJ's ruling on January 26 specifies that the court was not deciding whether Israel's acts in Gaza violate the Genocide Convention, simply whether the acts South Africa accused Israel of violating would, if proven, make a plausible case for such (see p. 12 pp. 30). https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240126-ord-01-00-en.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753912170348167489
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 345E5F7B3E9078CACE79ED89E154DCECB18E6184E769562B03C0C25F9124265D
  • createdAtMillis - 1707047690926
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1753912170348167489345E5F7B3E9078CACE79ED89E154DCECB18E6184E769562B03C0C25F9124265D