Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-03 10:06:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 54F739716792AFDA2DDEBA2D93A7FEF30480DCCB78F8F2D35E350059F1CD010B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il y avait 20%, et non 3% des terres, qui étaient privées si on compte les pâturages. Et c'était pas 25% de l'alimentation, mais 25% du PIB alimentaire, biaisé car l'agriculture collectivisée était subventionnée et vendait à bas prix (cf Joseph E Medley) https://web.archive.org/web/20070314063045/http://www.usm.maine.edu/eco/joe/works/Soviet.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753699277874897156
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 54F739716792AFDA2DDEBA2D93A7FEF30480DCCB78F8F2D35E350059F1CD010B
  • createdAtMillis - 1706954787688
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175369927787489715654F739716792AFDA2DDEBA2D93A7FEF30480DCCB78F8F2D35E350059F1CD010B