Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 09:35:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F6CEEAB62E5A1B3897F54D034E0C6E3FF7CBCF6C385A04ABF7F387F2E9AEC0D8
Participant Details

Original Note:

This misrepresents the finding of the paper, making them much more extreme. Table 2 shows that at surname level (not families), top 5 earners were among top earners (three are 80+ percentile and two other above median by wealth). Similar effect happens for 5 bottom earners https://academic.oup.com/restud/article-abstract/88/4/1863/5958123

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753694479872106895
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F6CEEAB62E5A1B3897F54D034E0C6E3FF7CBCF6C385A04ABF7F387F2E9AEC0D8
  • createdAtMillis - 1709112912304
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1753694479872106895F6CEEAB62E5A1B3897F54D034E0C6E3FF7CBCF6C385A04ABF7F387F2E9AEC0D8