Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-02 19:08:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CFB7EA5BCD6A8AA1D09334F436A0540E4E9AF673F1DD473EF48DDA0C9F6CC158
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. It’s his personal opinion. The nature of the jokes and the goal of the Company who employed him has obviously led him to this opinion. Nevertheless, it’s just his opinion and rebuttals belong in replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753486365189136622
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CFB7EA5BCD6A8AA1D09334F436A0540E4E9AF673F1DD473EF48DDA0C9F6CC158
  • createdAtMillis - 1706900909428
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1753486365189136622CFB7EA5BCD6A8AA1D09334F436A0540E4E9AF673F1DD473EF48DDA0C9F6CC158