Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-02 19:33:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A3B8B2AE241026FE52874DCB98D67AD7DD776AD24A221C638AC40FE6617B51A2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. It’s his personal opinion. The nature of the jokes and the goal of the Company who employed him has obviously led him to this opinion. Nevertheless, it’s just his opinion and rebuttals belong in replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753486365189136622
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A3B8B2AE241026FE52874DCB98D67AD7DD776AD24A221C638AC40FE6617B51A2
  • createdAtMillis - 1706902385067
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1753486365189136622A3B8B2AE241026FE52874DCB98D67AD7DD776AD24A221C638AC40FE6617B51A2