Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-04 18:45:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5D275857A775AB8F69CCF5AFE425907CA628F1A44D8C819B674F3A79A8B1B82A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. It’s his personal opinion. The nature of the jokes and the goal of the Company who employed him has obviously led him to this opinion. Nevertheless, it’s just his opinion and rebuttals belong in replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753486365189136622
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5D275857A775AB8F69CCF5AFE425907CA628F1A44D8C819B674F3A79A8B1B82A
  • createdAtMillis - 1707072358644
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17534863651891366225D275857A775AB8F69CCF5AFE425907CA628F1A44D8C819B674F3A79A8B1B82A