Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-04 09:40:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2964D7644835CF79A0DD43D5E236B97FD5E13A6ABDA2FC57AC1D2666C1946E94
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. It’s his personal opinion. The nature of the jokes and the goal of the Company who employed him has obviously led him to this opinion. Nevertheless, it’s just his opinion and rebuttals belong in replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753486365189136622
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2964D7644835CF79A0DD43D5E236B97FD5E13A6ABDA2FC57AC1D2666C1946E94
  • createdAtMillis - 1707039613746
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17534863651891366222964D7644835CF79A0DD43D5E236B97FD5E13A6ABDA2FC57AC1D2666C1946E94