Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-03 19:11:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C9AD1701B48C7F86AA42666D7884A579CEA7126763CC5A9ABE0E1216ED3C16FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet implies that Ms. Luna’s correspondence played a role in removing the case from the docket, when in fact this is a standard procedural calendaring move that delays trial while a immunity issue is appealed. Ms. Luna’s honesty has previously been called into question. https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/02/01/trump-trial-calendar-jan-6-delay/ https://people.com/politics/anna-paulina-luna-responds-washington-post-allegations/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753458729079447622
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C9AD1701B48C7F86AA42666D7884A579CEA7126763CC5A9ABE0E1216ED3C16FC
  • createdAtMillis - 1706987465820
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1753458729079447622C9AD1701B48C7F86AA42666D7884A579CEA7126763CC5A9ABE0E1216ED3C16FC