Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-02 21:56:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36DED4B563946682F452DDC364BB149CE7ABCC9223ABE84A5B24335F4477F12C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet implies that Ms. Luna’s correspondence played a role in removing the case from the docket, when in fact this is a standard procedural calendaring move that delays trial while a immunity issue is appealed. Ms. Luna’s honesty has previously been called into question. https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/02/01/trump-trial-calendar-jan-6-delay/ https://people.com/politics/anna-paulina-luna-responds-washington-post-allegations/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753458729079447622
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36DED4B563946682F452DDC364BB149CE7ABCC9223ABE84A5B24335F4477F12C
  • createdAtMillis - 1706910992267
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175345872907944762236DED4B563946682F452DDC364BB149CE7ABCC9223ABE84A5B24335F4477F12C