Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-02 16:57:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 22FE524D2C2393C30EEA72520C0C67CF69C3B92FD2A25E9462F460133648C6B6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet implies that Ms. Luna’s correspondence played a role in removing the case from the docket, when in fact this is a standard procedural calendaring move that delays trial while a immunity issue is appealed. Ms. Luna’s honesty has previously been called into question. https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/02/01/trump-trial-calendar-jan-6-delay/ https://people.com/politics/anna-paulina-luna-responds-washington-post-allegations/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753458729079447622
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 22FE524D2C2393C30EEA72520C0C67CF69C3B92FD2A25E9462F460133648C6B6
  • createdAtMillis - 1706893056231
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175345872907944762222FE524D2C2393C30EEA72520C0C67CF69C3B92FD2A25E9462F460133648C6B6