Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-02 16:35:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2C33018BAECFF983B56D1C9A77CF866A5030CE8D7604D6CB5D758E9FF73A1F7E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Nnn. The tweet is a reasonable summary. And you calling it ‘woke’ should be a comment, not a note. (And why are you linking to a list of citations, rather than the actual study: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/egnmj )

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753441741741363384
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2C33018BAECFF983B56D1C9A77CF866A5030CE8D7604D6CB5D758E9FF73A1F7E
  • createdAtMillis - 1706891730167
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17534417417413633842C33018BAECFF983B56D1C9A77CF866A5030CE8D7604D6CB5D758E9FF73A1F7E